Karma, Soul Incarnation and Reincarnation

---

Our Souls are 100% responsible for Us to attract " true goodwill " which
is intrinsically good - good karma.

The Universal Law of Harmony

---

   This law supersedes even the fundamental law of Karma. For " true goodwill " is intrinsically good; its value is wholly self-contained and utterly independent of its external relations. Therefore, " true goodwill " is the supreme potential of balance. The purpose of Karma is to attain harmony. If you throw a rock into a still pond you will disturb the harmony of that pond, you are the cause. The effect is a splash and series of waves on the surface of water that flows back and forth until the harmony is restored. Consequently, your incompatible actions with " true goodwill " will flow into the Universe and eventually will fell back on you, lifetime after life time, until your own " true goodwill " is restored.

---

 

Among the mysteries that were concealed from the masses was the doctrine of the pre-existence of the soul. In "The True Word", Celsus accused the early Church of teaching the masses the doctrine of heaven and hell while teaching the elect the doctrine of reincarnation. Origen does not refute Celsus, but rather explains that:

   In the year 553 A.D., 165 Church officials condemned reincarnation. Prior to that time, it had been a fundamental Christian teaching: following the trail of decisions that changed the world.

________________
By Benjamin Seiler

The Council of 451 Emphasises the Law of Reincarnation.

   Reincarnation was never once a topic of discussion. It was held to be a fundamental dogma, which was even reinforced by the Council of 451.
Who could have imagined then that Christian theology would so essentially change with the ascension of Justinian to the throne of the Eastern Roman Empire in 527, that under influence of his wife Empress Theodora it would have a profound unintended consequence occurred that the following centuries would suffer as a result?

---

 

Exerpt from some Buddhist text:

Man migrates from existence to existence, driven by the wind of his actions: there must be a Path to deliverance from rebirth and death. This Path must be a certain knowledge or esoteric wisdom, or a certain sacrifice, or a certain asceticism, or a certain ecstatic meditation.

www.twitter.com/MariaPortas said:

   There is a reason that we are all here in this world, and it is all about the discovery of Your Self. Your Self, that very real part of you that is wanting to bring forth something so spectacular. But it is only when we are aware of that which we are, that we can go on and discover that which we bring.

---

FROM HEAVEN TO EARTH

REINCARNATION

---

21ST JANUARY 2011

   A UNIVERSAL LAW INDISPENSABLE FOR THE HUMAN SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION.
THE CLASSIC PERFECT LAW, CAUSE AND EFFECT: ONE REAPS WHAT HE SOWS.
THE TRUE MANIFESTATION OF THE INFINITE MERCY OF THE ALMIGHTY FATHER, CREATOR OF HEAVEN AND EARTH, AND AT THE SAME TIME, THE SUPREME EXPRESSION OF HIS HOLY JUSTICE.
THE TYRANNIC AND EVIL POWER HAS ALWAYS TRIED TO HIDE THIS GREAT TRUTH FOR FEAR AND IGNORANCE, TO ENSLAVE AND SUBJUGATE SOULS. BUT THE TRUTH, THANKS TO THE MASTERS OF THE EAST AND TO THE MASTER OF ALL MASTERS HIMSELF, JESUS CHRIST, HAS TRIUMPHED OVER HOAX.
READ THE ATTACHED DOSSIER ON REINCARNATION AND THUS, AS ALWAYS, WE INVITE YOU TO MEDITATE AND DEDUCE.

G.B.

REINCARNATION WAS ACCEPTED BY THE ORIGINAL CHRISTIANITY

   Within Christianity, the reincarnation concept has been misinterpreted in several occasions, to the point of having been declared anathema, heresy in a historical moment for political reasons when Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire. This occurred even though the concept of reincarnation was clearly transmitted in the Bible and professed by some fathers of the Church.
   Fortunately, thanks to the research of many historians and to the recent discovery of several historical documents that reveal new insights into the origins of Christianity, we now know how, when and why this apparent disagreement between the official Christian theology and the doctrine of Reincarnation began. If reincarnation was an idea circulating among the early Christians, why did it disappear from the Christian religion as we know it today?
   It's hard to believe, but who outlawed the concept of reincarnation from Christianity was... A roman emperor!
And he did it for very mundane purposes.
In the early fourth century, the strongest Christian factions fought each other for influence and power, while at the same time the Roman Empire crumbled. In the year 325 AD, in a move to try to renew the unity of the empire, the absolute dictator, Emperor Constantine convened the leaders of the warring Christian factions at the Council of Nicaea. He offered them to release all his imperial power in favour of Christians if they resolved their differences and agreed on a single creed. The decisions made at this Council, created the foundation of the Roman Catholic Church. Soon, the books of the Bible would be edited and 'fixed' as well. On behalf of the unit, all the beliefs that conflicted with the new creed would be discarded. In the process, the factions and the writings that supported reincarnation were discarded.
   Apparently some Christians continued to believe in reincarnation even after the Council of Nicaea, because in the year 553 AD. the Church had the need to deal with the concept of reincarnation and condemn it clearly. In the Second Council of Constantinople the concept of reincarnation, combined with other ideas under the term "pre-existence of the soul" was declared as a crime worthy of excommunication and damnation (anathema).
In the year 543 of the present era, Emperor Justinian, regarded by historians as the last Roman Emperor, convened a synod in Constantinople, with the sole purpose of condemning Origen's teachings on the doctrine of reincarnation although the pretext was another: the deliberation on the "Three Chapters" of the dissident churches, considered by Justinian as rebels and heretics, that were not under the direct power of Rome. Origen was then the most respected and beloved Father of the original Christian Church.

Imperial Mandate against the Pope

   The council, also known as the Second Ecumenical Council, was chaired by Eutyches, candidate for the patriarchate of Constantinople, obviously subject to Justinian, and was attended by 165 bishops. But Pope Virgil, whose presence had been requested by the Emperor, was strongly opposed to the council and took refuge in a church in Constantinople, fearing the vengeful wrath of the evil Emperor. The Pope was not present in any discussion or didn't send any representative and therefore never accepted the doctrine of reincarnation was outlawed in the Christian creed.
   The council, under the total control of the Emperor and the Pope's absence, drew up a series of anathemas. Some historians say they were 14 and others 15, intentionally targeted against the three schools of thought described as heretical, the beliefs of which Justinian saw as enemies of his political interests and had in Origen as their most respected theologian. The documents were known thereafter as "The Three Chapters." Two of the anathemas drawn up by Justinian, are the following:

1. Who says or thinks that human souls pre-existed as spirits and holy powers, but that, tired of God's vision, turned bad, and because of this, the divine love in them died and so they became souls sentenced to be incarnated in bodies as a punishment, is anathema.
2. Who say or think the soul of the Lord pre-existed and was together with God, the Word before the Incarnation and Conception of the Virgin, is anathema.

Many of the Fathers of the Christian Church accepted the teaching of the so called Esoteric Christianity defending the truth about reincarnation.

"I did not put in writing what I think because there is an esoteric Christianity which is not for everyone." St. Clement from Alexandria (150-220).

"The soul lives more than once in human bodies, but it can not remember its past experiences." Dialogue with Trypho, Justin Martyr (100-165).

Considered the Father of Science of the Church, Origen (185-254) argued:

   "The pre-existence of the soul is immaterial and therefore it has no beginning or end. The predictions of the Gospels could not have been written with the intent of a literal interpretation. There is a steady progress towards perfection. All the spirits were created through no fault and all have returned, finally, to their original perfection. The education of the soul continues in successive worlds. The soul incarnates and experiences often death. The bodies are like glasses for the Soul, which gradually, life after life must be filled. First the mud glass, then the wooden glass, soon after the glass ones and finally the silver and golden glass. "

   It is in this event, chaired by a monarch and not a religious, that Christianity condemned the idea of reincarnation. But the power of Justinian was more than enough to make his personal decision to outlaw the reincarnation from the Christian canon, prevailing over the beliefs of the Pope himself. Virgil's successors, including Gregory the Great (590-604), despite they dealt with various issues arising from the Fifth Council, did not say anything at all about the concepts of Origen concerning the doctrine of reincarnation.

   The Pitfalls of a shrewd politician.
   Justinian forced the acceptance of his personal decision to what appeared to be merely a meeting of bishops that was never really a council, because it has neither the presence nor the pope's approval.
After all, what Bishop might have opposed to him and refused to follow his orders?
Since then the notion of reincarnation disappeared from Christian thought in Europe and many believe, still today, that the non-acceptance of reincarnation is a true inspired dogma.
All for the decision of ... a Roman emperor.
It is a fact that some Christian sects and writers accepted the reincarnation as an extension of the teachings of Christ. Origen from Alexandria, one of the acclaimed Church Fathers and St. Gregory described as "the Prince of Christian teaching in the third century", wrote: “ Each soul comes into this world strengthened by the victories and weakened by their previous lives' defeats. "
Why does the Church try so badly to discredit the reincarnation? The psychological impact of reincarnation may be the best explanation. A person, who believes in reincarnation, assumes responsibility for their own spiritual evolution through the rebirth. He or she does not need priests, confession or rituals to avoid the curse, ideas which are not part of jesus' teachings . The person needs only to care for his own actions towards himself and others. Believing in the reincarnation eliminates the fear of the eternal hell that the Church uses to discipline its flock. In other words, the reincarnation directly undermines the authority and power of the dogmatic Church . It is no weird then, that reincarnation makes the Defenders of The Faith so nervous. The Church was defending, in this outrageous act, the doctrine of heaven and hell and eternal punishment because it focused more power in its hands. And thus reincarnation was outlawed in one of the most serious mistakes committed by the Christianity.
In the Bible there are enough references to the phenomenon of reincarnation which can be argued that the ancient people of Israel knew the concept and even for some of their sects reincarnation was an essential part of their beliefs, especially in the sects like the Essenes and other practicing Kabbalah.
For Christians in particular, the most important events of reincarnation can be found in the words of Jesus in the Gospels.
Here are some examples below.

During the passage of the transfiguration Jesus tells His disciples: 

   “ Elijah has come, and they did not recognize him; but, they did to him whatever they wanted. Similarly the Son of Man will have to suffer at their hands. Then the disciples understood that He was speaking of John the Baptist.
Matthew 17:10-13, Mark 9:11-13, Luke 9: 33
(Implying that John the Baptist was the reincarnation of the prophet Elijah).

Jesus tells His disciples about John the Baptist:

"And if you want to take my word, John is the Elijah who has to come. He who has ears, listen.
-Matthew 11:14-15
Explicitly stating that John the Baptist is the reincarnation of the prophet Elijah.
Along the way, Jesus saw a man blind from birth.
And His disciples asked him: - Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that is was born blind? Neither he sinned, nor his parents - said Jesus - but this happened so that the work of God might be in him.
-John 9:1-3
(Implying that the man had previously lived before being born blind in this existence).
“Put your sword back in its place,” Jesus said to him, “for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.
(Matthew 26:52)
The Church has chosen to spread fear for hell and eternal damnation for us, rather than giving us the knowledge necessary to choose and be independent from blind obedience or promises, in order to be summoned to Paradise.
There are many other things that Jesus did, that if they were written one by one, I think the world itself, could not contain the books that should be written.
John 21:25.
It is said that the Bible does not teach reincarnation because this teaching is not written in it and therefore there is no such possibility. Jesus gave His teaching laminated to the inner circle and outer circle, for public and private, as clearly these Bible verses highlight:
Do not give holy things to the dogs and do not throw your pearls before swine. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.
Matthew 7:6.
He replied: “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. Whoever has, it will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have, it will be taken from them. This is why I speak to them in parables:
Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand”.
Matthew 13:11,13.
Jesus spoke all these things to the crowd in parables; He did not say anything to them without using a parable. So was fulfilled what was spoken through the prophet:
Matthew 13:34,35.
“The secret of the kingdom of God has been given to you. But to those, on the outside, everything is said in parables “.
Mark 4:11.

"With many similar parables Jesus spoke the word to them, as much as they could understand. He did not say anything to them without using a parable. But when he was alone with His own disciples, He explained everything. ."
Mark 4:33,34.
"To you is granted to understand the mystery of the kingdom of God, to others they spoke in parables so that seeing they do not see and hearing they do not understand."
Luke 8:10
Despite the decree of 553, the belief in reincarnation persisted among the believers row. It took another thousand years and much bloodshed to erase completely the idea. In the early thirteenth century, the Cathars, a devout and enlightened sect of Christians, who believed in reincarnation, flourished in Italy and southern France. The Pope launched a crusade to stop such heresy, half a million of people were massacred. the Cathars were completely wiped off the map. This drain set the tone of the following brutal Inquisition that would begin soon. Not only the belief in reincarnation was the cause of persecution, but any metaphysical idea falling out of the dogma of the Church. Today, due to the natural human evolution and the current mental awakening (the awakening is not the same for everyone because there are souls with more and less experiences) most people would accept reincarnation and other truths by inspiration and not by dogma.

http://en.giorgiobongiovanni.org/heavenly-messages/2011/3350-reincarnation.html

---

The Mechanics of Karma

by Noel Huntley, Ph.D.

The mechanism of karma appears to be a by-product of the design of life and the universe, and as a result provides a natural scheme of salvation.

We consequently have what we call karmic lessons. Without this karmic law (referred to in channeling as the 'great karmic law'), entities of consciousness would accumulate negativity and eventually become totally fragmented from the whole, resulting in annihilation. In turn this could ultimately destroy the whole. Thus it is desirable to have a mechanism which protects the whole.

The fragmentation results because in order to do something to another, which one would not want done to oneself, one must block off one's ability to perceive the other person's viewpoint. In doing this, one builds up occlusion within consciousness, fragmenting it, lowering the vibrations, and one gradually sinks into increasing unconsciousness. Note that such a process can't be observed when it is a gradual devolution. Consciousness fundamentally can only know its own state.

The karmic law creates debt whenever harm is done to another, which must be paid back. It is a mechanism which safeguards the whole (All That Is, God) but gives freewill to the fragments. Note that the law also pertains to good actions being returned to one, but the consequences of negative actions is of more concern.

It has been stated that this law cannot be annulled but it would appear this doesn't mean it can't ever be overridden by special procedures, either by the individual or on a grand scale by possibly such authorities as the so-called Karmic Board, or God.

In the East, people have retained an understanding of karma, contrary to Western education which omits it. Nevertheless, there has been a tendency, particularly in the East, to avoid helping another in karmic matters, with the misconception that they will incur karma by interfering with the individual's lessons.

However, to the contrary we can know that omission in helping others can incur karma. This is one of the reasons Christianity rejected karma, believing that members would similarly take on this belief in contradiction to the Christian teaching regarding serving others.

Individual karma often occurs in group experiences as group karma in which the members of the group plan the events prior to the particular lifetime. And of course this planning of a lifetime always applies to any individual karma that needs to be resolved similarly, which has resulted from past lives. This karma, created from previous lifetime experience, is brought into events which are planned prior to a lifetime with a view to resolving it.

The physics of karma has been described in terms of 'cause and effect'.

Fundamentally, however, and from the higher viewpoint, in which space and time are spanned, cause and effect is simultaneous. For example, the perpetrator harms the victim. Did the perpetrator cause this harm? From the third-dimensional viewpoint they apparently did, but taking into account more data we know that the victim also attracted the perpetrator. That is, each sought out the other - it is a simultaneous phenomenon.

This is an example of duality - a two-polarity system. The perpetrator pole and the victim pole are interdependent. You can't have one without the other. Evil can't exist without the opposite pole of receivers of evil.

Now this duality gives us a mechanism for the return of energy in order to learn lessons. A whole energy (quantum state) divides into two poles. One pole acts as a debt to pay back the energy. The process of paying back the energy is the same as the process of one pole or energy seeking wholeness by returning to the other to cancel it, leaving a condition of unity (higher dimensionally). That is, the energy seeks wholeness and the poles come together, causing a return to self of what was inflicted on another.

We might expect then that every selfish action splits unity into the two poles of the duality. The condition prior to this division is a harmonious, more four-dimensional one. All energies can operate in phase in this nondual 4D state, which means anyone can duplicate (can be) another's viewpoint and no harm is possible.

But by dividing the unity into two poles, these energies are kept separate (and, in addition, the frequencies are lowered).

Actions on the part of the individual utilizing the energies of one side of this duality can harm another. The other pole, the debt, will then seek the first pole to achieve unity, as this happens the individual experiences the negativity they originally put out. This experience, even subconsciously, can sometimes produce a cancellation of the opposites and a subsequent resolution of the karmic distortions.

This principle of cancellation given here has general physics applications. When we say bringing together the two poles (to cancel the debt/karma), this is the same as phase conjugation in which two wave patterns, one reversed relative to the other (which simply means 180 degrees out of phase), come together and cancel one another. This was achieved with the Priore machine in the 1970s which was developed to cancel disease patterns, before the invention was suppressed.

Another application of cancellation and phase conjugation was achieved by the Germans during WWII. They coated their U-boat periscopes with a material which caused radar to be reflected by 180 degrees, thus canceling itself. Note that in these examples of cancellation there is no reference to the two poles coming together to form a unity as in the karmic examples - this wouldn't be recognized in our current physics anyway - but in fact they do higher dimensionally.

The duality configuration is exactly the same as given in the article on the basic energy unit: the two centripetal spirals of energy coming from the 4D periphery of the vortex to the centre, forms two poles and the subsequent oscillation between them. In terms of physics, the two poles shouldn't be visualized as in 3D, side by side, but one pole 'inside' the other 4th-to-3rd dimensionally (but is symmetrical with it).

Thus if we have two people, A and B, representing the perpetrator and the victim respectively, each will have this duality in their own mind, that is, perpetrator/victim polarity. Person A will, say, be dramatizing the perpetrator, and B the victim (they may change roles in another life).

Each person projects out into the external world the imbalance. Person A seeks a balance by finding a victim B, and person B seeks a balance in perpetrator A. Eventually the duality resolves into unity and wholeness but it appears as though it may take many roles of A and B, alternating from perpetrator to victim until they resolve the imbalance internally by observing their internal condition reflected outwards. Conscious awareness of this will speed up the process.

The ego is essentially a mass of unresolved dualities each influencing the individual to resolve the polarities into unity. We can draw the conclusion that a behavior which involves no effort to resolve these dualities results in learning by misadventure; that is, the basic imbalance reacts to seek balance - person A kills B, and A must now be killed. This is the slow and painful way of overcoming karma - it isn't very efficient. 

Is there any other way this could be resolved? It is apparent that if A attempts self-improvement to a sufficient degree, or works in service to others, etc. the basic reaction is alleviated and A will not have to be killed in turn. The very activity of applying effort to bring about change of a positive nature will eventually cancel the karma.

A miraculous change would always be possible, however, in which A perceives the imbalance within self by some therapeutic process or otherwise, and realigns it, resolving the karma immediately. These negatively karmic thoughts are of low frequency and it appears that they are stored as crystallized imprints in cells. It would be ideal to release these, transmute these energies, before they manifest in physical reality.

The mechanism described here will adhere of course to rigorous physics but karma in general will entail various factors that we can envisage as superimposed on the rigid mechanism.

For example, intervention from high levels (already alluded to) and manipulation of karmic energies in situations where, for instance, a large group of people may experience a disaster to offset the karma of the whole race. Also, on the down side, karma can be coded into the DNA to incline people to commit negative acts and then (coded to) receive them back on themselves.

Possibly the most advanced method as far as knowledge is concerned, of handling karma, requiring not only persistence but a great deal of awareness, is through the recognition that the environment is reflecting one's inner state. More specifically, all problems, discomforts, conflicts impinging on one from the environment are fragments of oneself which one has disowned.

This applies even if one is merely an observer of a discomforting situation. If one can understand that these experiences reflect one's own attributes that one has rejected, and integrate these into self - bring them in, not push them away - Karma becomes pointless. 

As one may have realized, this method will involve intricate organization of group relationships so that it works for everyone. Science would reject this as impossible but we say it isn't. It actually means that not only is oneself involved in this process but also others, even if it is a simple observation of another's problem.

For example, you observe another's illness (the importance of which will depend how close this person is to you), and if a positive attitude is taken it will include both oneself and one's view of the other person, aiding not only resolving one's own disowned experiences, relating to the observation, but also the other person's illness. The implication here is that more than the ill person may be involved in that person's illness.

Thus the strict and apparent unwavering mechanics of karma on the lower level must be viewed in relationship to a larger context involving other solutions for the karma, along with factors from higher influences, probabilities and intervention.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/huntley/esp_huntley_10.htm

 

This part of the whole article is offered under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. It’s okay to republish anything as long as original attribution bio is included and all links remain intact.

---

A must read. An excellent article on Emperor Justinian wife, the Empress Theodora, see: Theodora - The Syriac Empress of Byzantine. Empress Theodora, Emperor Justinian wife.
Also, see:
Reincarnation in the Bible. By Kevin Williams

---

This is my ponder study today in regards the Soul and reincarnation.

by fb Jocelyn Lombardi

"Without Exception, your present life is the result of your past, and you are presently creating and forming your future. Without Exception, if you are a victim of any of life's circumstances, then you have made yourself a victim by virtue of your own actions, inactions, or complacency. Without Exception, your own past actions is responsible for your present gender, race, sexual orientation, social and economic station in life, manner of thinking and mindset, and even the religious, political and cultural conditions of the life you are presently living. It is the mind that raises man above the beasts of the earth -- that permits him to prevail over the forces of nature -- that enables him to rule over his environment -- overcoming even the very force of gravity that holds him to the earth, and traveling to distant heavenly bodies that his ancestors worshiped as gods.
And to escape the limitations of this world, and begin to rule of one's self in pursuit of the Inner Kingdom (see Gate Of Eden) -- and through this expansion of the mind beyond the organic limitations of earth-consciousness, the prodigal sons and daughters are able to fulfill the Laws in the same way as their Elder Brother Jesus taught, and become re-born in the Kingdom while still in the body-vessel. Thus, to this end the Gospel of Philip declares: "Those who say that first they shall die and (then) they shall arise are confused. If they do not first receive the resurrection (while) they live, they will not receive anything (when) they die." (That is quoted from a composition by Allan called Divine Manna, but FB will not allow the link to be posted because it goes against community standards) "your past" would, I think I assume correctly, be the reincarnated past lives of the Soul).
The Soul then chooses a vessel where it receives the actions of the mind. The mind of the vessel starts from infancy to adulthood, where the mind is "learning" and having actions from the learning. Does the reincarnated Soul merge into the new-born mind its experiences from its past lives? It would have to in order for the "present life to be the result of one's past." But my vessel self, which was born of flesh with a brain to incorporate a mind, is totally new and the brain is new with no past.
Since the new brain has no past and the new brain enables the developing mind to function, how does the Soul with its past experiences influence the present and future? It would have to overtake the mind; right? So, it then becomes the Soul that is influencing the mind of the vessel it inhabits. The mind has no choice but to be influenced by the Soul in order for the statement "without exception, your present life is the result of your past, and you are presently creating and forming your future," which means, essentially, the mind (fed from the past-lived Soul) has to know, while incorporated into a brain, which the brain enables it, all that if failed or gained in the Soul's past, since the brain, which enables the mind, has no past, since it he brain as born new.
The Soul/Self then is the director of each Earthly life it inhabits? If that is the case, why would a Soul direct a vessel to be a liar or a murderer? A "present life - vessel -- has no past. The present life (vessel with brain), then, has nothing to correct from the past since there is no past for a vessel that gets born and has a "lifetime" while on the Earth. So, essentially, some people have no choice to be a murderer because of "predestination"; is that correct?

Origen stated, "in the beginning, each soul was created equal and the same, and their place in life is not the result of an accident, or the indiscriminate manifestation of God's Will in the form of Divine Providence -- but rather, each soul's lot in life is the result of the exercise of their own freewill, and consequently is arranged “according to their merit”. This statement which follows is confusing to me: "This merit is not the result of some unknown condition -- but rather, is imposed upon each individual in accordance with what they have accomplished in their previous lives," quoting from http://ebionite.com/vegetarian.htm#TheLaws and the section titled "Early Church on Predestination."

Summarizing then, essentially, the "merit" "imposed upon EACH INDIVIDUAL in accordance with what they have accomplished in their previous lives" cannot be a declaration,because EACH INDIVIDUAL is a vessel that was born new with a new brain that enables the mind. A new vessel has never existed and, thus, has no previous lives. It is the Soul that has had previous lives. And if, according to Origin, "each soul's lot in life is the result of the exercise of their own freewill (the Soul's freewill), then it must be the Soul exercising its freewill by feeding the mind of the body/vessel it inhabits to do as it, the Soul, wants to do. The body, brain, mind of a vessel in its present form on Earth has no past. The Soul brings with it its past, which it designed by its own freewill. If the Soul is what influences a non-past mind, then it becomes that the mind has to overcome the Soul's past in order to break away from the karma which the Soul itself created.

I will take me as an example. I my vessel self) was born anew with a new body, new brain, new mind. The Soul that inhabits me chose me. The Soul that chose me has a past. Me, the vessel, has no past and me, the vessel, is not the Soul. I am merely the vessel with the brain and mind. If the Soul that inhabits me had a past life as a murderer, it somehow has to be influencing my mind so that my mind can "think" on being a better "person" than a murderer and needs to learn kindness, respect, empathy, compassion, and even who Father is. But if I am to learn that the Soul has no influence on the mind, which means its past lives have no influence on the mind, then the vessel, brain, and mind have the freewill. And if the Earthly "me" is a murderer, then I implant that into the Soul that inhabits me. Essentially I nourished the Soul with the energy of a murderer.
But that is not what Origin is stating. He stated the "soul's lot in life is the result of the exercise of (its) own freewill." The question becomes then: Who has freewill? The vessel with the brain and the mind? Or is it the Soul that inhabits that has the freewill. If a vessel's life is predestined by the Soul that inhabits it and the Soul is the entity that chooses its vessel to inhabit and that person becomes a murderer, it was the Soul that was the reason for becoming a murderer; right, deducing what Origin is sayiing? If, however, my mind is stronger than the influence of the freewill of the Soul who predestined me to be a murderer, then I have to use my mind by overcoming a predestination so as not to become a murderer, achieving the overcoming by loving the principles of God and the goodness of God.

Taking me as an example again, except this time a real example, I revolted against Constantine-style Christian ideology. Therefore, I was, supposedly, predestined to accomplish that revolt so that the Soul that inhabits and chose me would experience that nourishment that I accomplished with my mind or by influence from the Soul itself by influencing my mind? I seek to be one with the Mind of God, to be a "begotten Son." I have much to "perfect" with the use of my mind in order to even reach that realm. If when my vessel dies my mind has not reached that realm. the Soul will leave me, having with it what my mind imprinted on it. Did I use my mind by freewill or was my mind influenced by the Soul?
Then when the Soul departs, where my mind has not evolved to perfection, was it the Soul's freewill influence on my mind the reason why my in my Earthly this life I was not able to accomplish perfection? Could it be that the Soul attains its perfection when it decides to do so and takes many lifetimes of vessels to "experience life" before making the freewill decision it wants to return its Spark form back with God? Freewill, according to Origin, is at the discretion of the Soul. Maybe the Earth is populated with non-perfected vessels because the Souls are wanting to have as much experience at life" before influencing the minds of the vessels they inhabit to finally attain/reach perfection?

Jesus said to seek and it will be sought, and he was saying that, teaching that to vessels on Earth, not the Souls inhabiting the vessels. That says to me we as vessels have to use our minds to break the freewill of the Soul which predestines our Earthly lives. Our Soul, the Spark of God, seems to, because of freewill, wanting to experience all aspects of life, and we can see that pertains to experiencing good and bad and being the good or bad. God sent the Souls off to experience so that God can experience. But by freewill, Souls are choosing to stay within lifetimes of vessels for experience, using their freewill to predestine a vessel's life. The Souls are the prodigal sons, not the newly made vessels with the brains and the minds that mature into adulthood, at least by what is the result of deducing Origin's claim of the Souls exercising their freewill.

Jesus, then, was the example of overcoming the freewill of the Soul and attaining perfection and becoming, once again, "one with the Mind of God." Because, according to Origin,each Soul, being created equal and at the same time, used their freewill to a "lot in life (lot in a vessel's life). And the reason this happened, the freewill of the Souls wanting to experience life, which included the freewill to experience bad and evil and create bad and evil, is because the Soul, when sent off from its creation, became consciously separated from God.
Paraphrasing: the door to the transmutation of self is found in the union of opposites (male/female) in the restoral of Adam/Eve, and the process of rebirth into the Kingdom.
"When the Lord was asked by a certain man, when should his kingdom come, he said unto him, when two shall be one and the without as the within, and the male with the female, neither male nor female.” Once it is understood that all things that exist, exist within the Divine Pattern of Male/Female, then the far reaching reality of these words begin to become a realization -- i.e., the very bed-rock of man's search for Truth, Self, and his Creator God, can only be brought about in the environment of marriage between a Man/Woman who manifest the Light in their lives.
When the Soul used its freewill and has used lifetimes of vessels to experience life, it divided itself into its Earthly aspect as either male or female, when in reality the Soul is neither. When, by freewill, it chooses a vessel, it is choosing to either inhabit a female or male body.
The separateness the Soul creates, by its freewill to experience life, is the same separation it made from its Source when given its freewill. Jesus' teachings were to help us overcome our "perceived" separateness as male or female human beings, one from another, and overcome our separateness from God.
God is genderless but with father/male//mother/female aspects. We need to overcome our Souls, which are wanting to experience separateness through freewill, the "real" prodigal sons. We vessels are to use our minds to cause the Souls that inhabit us to once again become "begotten sons," "rebirthed sons,: not remain prodigal sons. We do this by seeking God with all our heart, soul (inner self) (NOT THE SOUL who is the SPARK), and mind.
We need to do our best if OUR lifetimes to direct the Soul that inhabits us, the prodigal son that inhabits us, back to being "one" with God.

---

' Reposted with permission from; fb Jocelyn Lombardi .'

'Giving permission to repost; does not necessarily imply endorsement of this website author(s) personal beliefs.'

Reposted under: U.S. Fair Use and Canadian Fair Dealing 29.1 and 29.2